Crest of the Peacock intro Reflection

 Three things that surprised me from the article is as follows:

1, Herodotus, Proclus, Aristotle Thales, Pythagoras were all influenced by Egyptians, but early 1900's mathematicians claimed that "the history of mathematics cannot with certainty be traced back to any school or period before that of the Ionian Greeks"

2, Babylonians knew how to solve quadratics in different way and knew Pythagorian theorem. 

3, Indians were very well-versed in trigonometry especially sine function.

1, It is understandable, given that the belief of white supremacy was widespread during the early 1900s, that the European scholars wanted to claim that ancient Greeks who they believed were culturally and racially unified group of people to be the basis of development of mathematics. However, it surprises me that they could ignore that they decided not to look deeper into the records of the ancient scholars above which clearly shows records of exchange of knowledge as mentioned in the article. 

2&3, I was simply not aware that ancient civilizations could come up with what I believed to be a fairly advanced mathematics. The article also mentions that they had a different ways of solving quadratics and using sine functions, which made me very curious of how they would have done differently from the methods that I was taught. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Numbers with Personality

Implementing History in Math

History of Math Day 2